This site is an archive of the OneSpace Forums. Return to forum index.

POLITICS and WELFARE

Sally C

Hi Everyone - there is a LOT of press at the moment around 'family breakdown' and marriage, and what Labour and Tory party thinks about it all. With the election looming, I suspect that the family is going to be a big issue for both parties.

What would you like to see the political parties doing for single parents? What have been the main issues for you in 2009? What do you think should change about the welfare system, or stay the same? Do you have any opinions/experiences you would like to share? We can use (confidential) quotes from One Space in our lobbying work to try and influence parliament about their decisions on single parents. Let us know what you think! (Of course we will ask before using quotes).

Also, if you would like to share an experience but don't want to over the boards, there is a confidential email option, which you can find here:
http://groups.onespace.org.uk/welfr/ Please note though that I am unable to respond the emails, so if you need any info/answers, it's best to post up here.

Thanks in advance!
Sally C :)

Posted on: December 4, 2009 - 11:27am
Bubblegum
DoppleMe

I'd like them to leave single parents alone, forget about us, stop using us to further their carriers either by condemning us or going on about how badly we have it.

Don't vote it only encourages them..

By this seemingly straightforward act you are tacitly endorse a sham democracy and are unlikely to change anything really important. Voting alone does not a democracy make. It crucially depends on which particular issues you are allowed to vote for, or not.

Why is our democracy a sham? Democracy is supposed to be 'rule by the People' but there are huge areas in the UK system of government where the People have absolutely no say at all, such as foreign policy and defence. They also cannot influence by voting the decisions of global organisations which may have a profound effect on the lives of UK citizens, such as the G8 and the WTO. Much the same applies to multi-national corporations and quangos operating within the UK.

So what are you allowed to vote for? A strictly limited set of policies contained in a party manifesto, mere promises which may or may not be honoured during the next term of office before you are permitted to vote again. Those who abstain from voting may not be able to bring about a proper democracy in the immediate future but at least they will have the satisfaction of knowing they are not helping to perpetuate a downright lie.

From indymedia, I'd put a link only the last time I linked to something particularly political the post was deleted :) tsk, tsk,

Posted on: December 8, 2009 - 9:06am
sparklinglime
DoppleMe

I think that the view point of lone-parents needs to be changed. If a parent wants to be at home with their child/ren then it should be looked on positively.

The role of the parent should be seen as vital and necessary even when they're teenagers. I might not have felt this way when my children were younger, but I think my eldest has needed me more since he was 15!!! (not that this will happen in every case, of course :D ) Benefits should remain in place until the youngest leaves full-time education. At the end of the day, we are raising future tax payers.

Ignore those who are scroungers - you can't change that attitiude in someone, and they are in all walks of life - employed, unemployed; in a relationship, single; rich, poor... They will always shout louder, always feel hard done by, always be the victim and will always expect everyone to do everything for them. Stop tarring the rest of the world with that brush.

In Wales, I've been able to get a grant to study. While I don't seem to be doing very well 8-) I really do value the opportunity to learn as I feel it has brought me back into the adult world a bit after being so child focused.

Child care should be there if the parent wants it. I worked from home for years and then nights so I could be there for my children - but that was my choice (if someone told me to do that today, I'm sure I couldn't!). I think if someone has a good career then being able to fit child care so a parent can keep that career on track would be, I'm sure, a godsend to many.

Social housing. The lack of social housing means that tenants are never quite able to let their gaurd down. The worry that children will damage the carpet or wallpaper, or the landlord will raise the rent so it's too high - or worse still the landlord sells up making you homeless :( I think to be a good parent, or indeed good parents, you do need security when raising children that your home will not be lost through. There should be ample social housing built so that those who are not able to buy have affordable rents and a secure home. The government could solve so many issues having a building plan. So many out of work builders at the mo...

I might come back with more. I need to take my neighbour shopping. Social housing is a big thing with me... No one should have gone through what the children and I went through. And I know some go through so much worse.

Posted on: December 8, 2009 - 11:39am
harissa

I've been dealing with yet another family crisis, yes another one! Just been reading the online DM and came across this article
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1233945/Harriet-Harman-unveils-plan-allow-workers-claim-paid-leave-look-sick-relatives.html

It describes "the so-called 'sandwich generation' - working women who have to care for both young children and ageing relatives." and I think it is something worth keeping an eye on. It argues that it is women not men (WHY??? OK, from experience it is true but WHY???), who have these care responsibilities and that employers should make allowances for us. Effectively this will make women an uneconomic choice for employers, especially small employers, to take on. So single mums will be even more discriminated against in the job market - it is bad enough already!

It will keep us trapped in the situation where we have to be everything to everyone, providing services and community stability for free (because that's what mums do), while still being blamed for scrounging as we're not contributing actual money into the system. Even worse, the situation is being spun to make it look like the government is doing everything to help us when precisely the opposite will result. It will end in tears.

Posted on: December 8, 2009 - 11:41am
harissa

Oops, I missed a bit from that last post. What I wanted to say was that I think this is a sneaky way for the government to pass the bill for social welfare onto employers. Think about it.

Posted on: December 8, 2009 - 11:44am
Louise
Parenting specialist DoppleMe

Yes, harissa and it may end up with employers being forced to have a quota system: so many single parents, so many people with disabilities, a certain ethnic mix. This so-called "positive discrimination" can force employers out of business and then they can't give jobs to anyone

I agree with sparkling lime about housing but also I feel strongly about help to pay the rent. When a person goes from benefits to work, their Housing Benefit becomes minimal and this means a lot of people feel no better off.

If there was a system where single parents were encouraged and supported to stay at home with school-aged children then they would have to extend that to couples as well so that one parent could stay at home. If one of a couple is working then there is no acknowledgement in the taxation or benefits system that there is another non-earning adult to support with that wage. So therefore an extra allowance would need to be paid. Let's face it, it just won't happen....

Posted on: December 8, 2009 - 1:16pm
harissa

Because of my chemical sensitivity problem and other health issues, I always pay a visit to look round the office or building of all suitable jobs before sending off my application forms. Interestingly all the jobs I applied for seemed to be staffed exclusively by women. Hardly any men to be seen - which somewhat thwarts my hope of meeeting a nice new man in the workplace! The balance of the sexes was markedly different from when I worked in insurance in the 80s.

For that matter, where have all the male teachers gone??? Don't men apply for teaching jobs any more? Where are those male role models for our boys?

My son's father has found short-notice agency work working in a warehouse. Apparently that is where men can be found working, along with single women who have no young dependants. The hours, naturally, are totally out of the question for any lone-parent with care responsibilities - unless the government decides to set up night-care for our babies, toddlers and young kids? Ugh! Dreadful thought!

I got the distinct impression that women like me are already snapping up all the flexible family friendly jobs - yep, the very ones which tend to be poorly paid. So your family still ends up stuck in the benefit system, whilst working, UNLESS you are the wife of a high-earning man.

Posted on: December 12, 2009 - 1:38pm